For coaches, consultants, and the people clients lean on between sessions

You get an hour. You lose your client between the hours.

They work the real thing out in the days you’re not there — on the commute, at 11pm, after a hard conversation. By the time they’re back in front of you, they remember the conclusion but not how they got there, and you spend the first twenty minutes rebuilding it. Unfogged catches the thinking in their own words, so the session picks up the thread instead of reconstructing it.

What your client hands you ↓
For your session
Session PrepLast 2 weeks · across 9 threads
In their words — across three threads
“…I just don’t want to let everyone down.” · “…maybe this is what adults do.” · “…I don’t know why I can’t commit.”
Where you are
Across all three, you weigh what everyone else needs. Nowhere do you say what you want.
An overview — shared by your client

A glimpse — illustrative, not a real client. The full overview is below.

What it won’t do

Your client is getting agreement everywhere else.

Every other AI hands their story back smoother and surer than they brought it — that’s what keeps them coming back. Unfogged isn’t built that way. It doesn’t flatter, doesn’t reassure, doesn’t tell them what to do. It names the line they’re going around and stops. They arrive having been read, not agreed with — which is the part you can actually work with.

What it does for the session

A constructive catch-up — grounded in what they actually carried.

Nothing about how you open changes — what changes is where the catch-up starts. It begins from what the client really worked through between sessions, in their own words, not whatever they can reconstruct from memory in the first ten minutes.

You spend less of the hour rebuilding context and more of it on the work. The session starts where the work actually begins, the client arrives remembering how they got there — not just the conclusion — and the breakthroughs land faster because you’re not catching up to them. The client shows up already on the thread, and remembers who they were with when it landed.

How it works

Three steps. Nothing new for you to run.

1
Your client writes it out — voice or text — when something follows them home. When the meeting keeps replaying, when they can’t stop rehearsing tomorrow, when the argument keeps changing shape. No structure. The brief is theirs first — they own it, and they get it whether or not they ever show it to you. Most tools own the client’s data; here, the client does. That’s why they trust it enough to write the real thing.
2
Unfogged reads it. It points to what their writing keeps circling and what’s missing from it, and quotes their words back as the evidence. It never advises, never assesses, never adds its own thinking. They choose whether to hand it to you.
3
They arrive already on the thread. No starting from scratch. The session goes where it matters from the first minute.
What your client hands you

An overview of what they’re carrying in.

Not a transcript. A picture of where they are across everything they’re working — so you can see the shape before the session starts.

For your session
Session PrepLast 2 weeks · across 9 threads
In their words — across three threads
“…I just don’t want to let everyone down.” · “…maybe this is what adults do.” · “…I don’t know why I can’t commit.”
Where you are
Across all three, you weigh what everyone else needs. Nowhere do you say what you want.
The role3 briefs
My sister2 briefs
Whether to move1 brief
Illustrative — not a real client

The overview is what’s shared by default — the spread, not the detail.

Your client can also hand you the full brief on a single situation, when that’s what they want. Their call, one at a time.

The questions you’d ask first
Is this coaching software?
No. It reads and names what a client’s own writing shows, between sessions. It doesn’t coach or advise. The work is yours — Unfogged never enters the session uninvited.
Can I use it on my own cases?
Yes. Write up the one you’re stuck on and read it for what you’re not saying about it. The gap it names is in your telling of the case — that’s the point.
Will my clients actually write and share?
They write because the brief is for them first — they get something back whether or not they show you. Sharing rides the ask you already make: “come to our next session with this in front of you.” Nothing’s forced, nothing’s automatic. The ones who’d have arrived foggy are the ones it helps most.
Can I see a client’s briefs without sharing?
No. Your client shares what they choose — an overview, or a single brief, deliberately, one at a time. You never see what they didn’t hand over, and nothing arrives automatically. The trust is the point.
Will clients stop needing me if they have this?
The opposite. Clients arrive more ready, so your work goes further and the session lands faster. The brief surfaces what’s missing — it doesn’t coach them through it. That’s still you.
What happens with sensitive writing?
It stays the client’s. Briefs aren’t shared unless the client shares them, aren’t used to train models, aren’t visible to anyone else.
The founding group

I’m taking on a few coaches to work with by hand.

I’m working with a small number of advisors by hand because I don’t yet know what the perfect between-session workflow looks like — and the people who hold the thread between sessions are the ones who’d know. You’d get it first, shape how the brief lands in the session, and lock founding terms.

If you sit with people at decision points — or hold the thread between their sessions — I’d like to hear how you’d use it.